It's time for "Don't Ask Don't Tell" (DADT) to GO!!!
I couldn't say it better than was done by former federal worker in the Stars and Stripes in a letter in Stars and Stripes last week. Read ... with full understanding:
My former supervisor is a veteran of both gulf wars. He's lived in close quarters with gays, fought beside them, been under fire with them. DADT makes him extremely angry; he says, "if the guy covering me knows how to handle a gun, what do I care if he's gay?" Does Marine Mom know how many variances soldiers are fighting under, for mental conditions and criminal records, right next to her son, while men and women whose only crime is their orientation, are being ejected? And is it making an issue of your orientation because your sweetheart's picture is the wrong gender? Ask anyone serving in a unit where somebody has been discharged under DADT, and you won't find relief; you'll find anger that good soldiers are being let go, and that is a morale-buster right there. Anyone brave enough and patriotic enough to wish to serve our country and put his or her life down for it deserves respect, and, just as happened with integrating troops in the past, in a civilized nation, it has to be done even if some people are upset. Further, the real waste of money is on the investigations, lawsuits, and resources spent on trying to expel these good men and women. Ending DADT would save money and resources. Bringing home our soldiers is a worthy goal that wouldn't be set back one minute by ending DADT.Written by former federal worker
27 September 2010
Although not in uniform, I "served" as a civil servant "in-theater" during both the Vietnam War (1969-70) at Tan San Nhut Air Base adjoining MACV in Saigon and as a military contractor before, during and after the first Gulf War (1990-1991) in Riyadh and share the same thoughts as the letter-writer above.
Although it is probably correct for President Obama to avoid waiting (possibly forever) for Congress to add a repeal of DODT in the Defense Authorization Bill, it seems ludicrous for the White House to have given the "go ahead" for its Justice Department to appeal the court case of three weeks ago wherein the Federal Court stated in words that are almost written right out of the US Constitution that "Don't Ask Don't Tell" has to go!
From the outset, I thought DODT was a dishonest idea, even though it was attempting to right an obvious wrong.
2 Comments:
When you join any service you should tell them if you are gay or lesbian, because of the disease aids and it can infect others if they are bleeding. So I can understand why they would be worried,and they need not be involved with anyone in the service either, for safety reasons. But if the service would check them out,before they let them in to make sure they are not infected with aids, then I don,t see why they can't fight for their country. But they chose their relationship which is against God's word and they should know that and not be surprised of why they are getting rejected, because what you sow you will reap and it says it in God's word.We don't get away with anything, because God will deal with us in the end. From a Child of the Most High God
All servicemembers are given health screenings -- and not just for infectious diseases, such as influenza, measles and smallpox. And by the way, atheists and agnostics have always been accepted--and a couple have even been Presidents of the United States.
And just because your statues of Bhudda are generally large does not mean he's the "most high god"--only your "most high god."
Post a Comment
<< Home